01 to 14 page 01 TO 14
Analysis September 2007
01 to 14 brigade of
information |
02-09-OUTROS APENSOS II (FILE
09) pages 01 to 14 |
TRANSLATION BY INES |
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_01 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_02 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_03 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_04 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_05 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_06 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_07 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_08 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_09 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_10 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_11 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_12 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_13 |
|
OApenso_2_Rel_sep_07_Page_14 |
|
Reports from the Brigade for
Information Analysis Sep 2007
No page numbers written on files.
I have done a summarised translation
of a
report compiled by the Brigade of
Information Analysis in September
2007 for the PJ (the report
consists of
14 pages).
This report was based upon a
timeline analysis (the result of
statements made to the PJ and to
Control Risk by 5 elements of the
T9, by the client support service
staff from Mark Warner and from
other statements, a text having been
compiled for an English analyst) and
various chronogrammes of
communications elaborated and
presented to the British police who
were in Portugal in cooperation with
the PJ.
(-----)
From the analysis of the timeline it
was possible to conclude:
On 3rd May at about 18.00 (when she
left the Kids club) until 22.00 when
her mother gave the alert, nobody
apart from the parents, Kate and
Gerry, saw Madeleine. During the
checks carried out, Matthew, at
21.00 only checked outside the
apartment by the shutters and at
21.30 entered the apartment, but did
not confirm whether Madeleine was
there (unless
David saw her between 18.30 and
19.00 at Gerry's request).
Discrepancies in the statements
- During Gerry's first questioning
(Folio 34) he said that at 21.05
when he went to his apartment to
'check' the children, he entered by
the main door; during his second
questioning (Folio 891) he changed
this by saying he had entered
through the patio doors.
- During Gerry's first questioning
he said that Kate, at 22.00, when
she went to the apartment, entered
by the locked front door . When she
entered she noticed the door to the
children's bedroom was opened
inwards, the window was open and the
shutter was raised. (if
this had happened, she would not
have noticed this scene after
entering. She would have noticed
this before entering the apartment,
as she would have passed the window
of the children's bedroom).
- During his second questioning,
Gerry said that Kate entered through
the patio doors.
- During Kate's questioning she said
that she entered through the patio
doors.
- During Gerald's second
questioning, he says that he was
playing tennis on 3rd May between
18.00 and 19.00. At about 18.30
David arrived at the tennis courts
and the went back to his apartment.
Presuming that it was certain that
David would return to play tennis,
Gerald asked him to check whether
all was well with the children and
Kate.
- During his questioning (Folio 66)
David Payne was not asked about this
request, it is not known whether he
was with Kate and the children
between 18.30 and 19.00.
- During his questioning, Matthew
(Folios 52 and 905) stated that at
21.00 when he 'checked' from the
outside of the apartment, the
shutter was closed. But when he
entered the apartment at 12.30, he
said there was more light than usual
in the children's bedroom, that the
curtains were closed and that it
occurred to him that the shutter
might be open (note
how he did not find this
circumstance strange, when it should
be considered absolutely abnormal).
Gerald himself, when Matthew
returned to the restaurant and said
everything was fine, stated that he
thought the shutter was closed.
Note: The italics are from the
authors.
If the child being carried by the
man referred to by Jane was
Madeleine, then the ' eventual -
abductor (given the tiny space of
time between Gerry's exit from the
apartment and the moment when Jane
claims to have seen the man) would
have to have been inside the
apartment when Gerry went there at
21.05/21.10, and especially because
Matthew, at 21.00 carried out an
external check and guaranteed that
the shutter of Madeleine's bedroom
window was shut.
If it was not Madeleine and Jane,
with hindsight, although
unintentionally, created this
conviction, the disappearance could
have occurred after that time,
between Gerry exit and Matthew's
entrance at 21.30, or between the
latter entrance and Kate's arrival
at 22.00.
Moreover, because Gerald as well as
Jez, who were talking close to the
apartment and 25 metres away from
the place where the man carrying the
child would have passed and both
stated not having seen Jane pass
before them and neither did they see
the man.
The brigade team made charts and
analysed phone calls made by the T9
between 21-04-2007 and 06-05-2007.
Conclusions (Regarding phone calls)
The analysis we undertook did not,
in truth, reveal major dissonance or
pertinent questions, except perhaps
the existence of diverse numbers
contacted (sometimes insistently) by
some of the members of the group and
the owner of those telephone lines '
presumably because they did not
correspond to national
telecommunications operators ' were
not identified, knowledge of this
information could eventually be
useful.
Restricting this information to the
McCann couple, once established that
no communications that could be seen
as suspicious were detected from the
other members of the group, the
following calls are notable:
1. Gerald (TM 4477********), the
numbers:
- 4478******** from which 14 text
messages were received on the eve of
the disappearance 02-05-2007 and
another 4 messages on 04-05-2007.
- 4479******** the only number to
contact the girl's father during the
afternoon of the disappearance
(12.24).
- 4413******** to which Gerry made a
long call (of more than 11 minutes)
at 23.40 on 03-05-2007 and which he
contacted again at 00.05, 00.13 and
00.21, receiving a return call of
2.28 minute at 00.27, which was the
last contact registered between
these 2 numbers.
2. Kate (TM 4479********), the
numbers:
- 4479******** the only number to
contact Madeleine0s mother by SMS on
the afternoon of 03-05-2007 at 12.31
and 12.34, the following
communications being two short calls
(6 and 29 seconds respectively) made
by Gerry to his wife after the
disappearance at 23.14 and 23.17.
- 4479******** ' for which there is
a register of 20 messages between
the number and Kate's mobile and
also 5 calls during the early
morning on 04-05-2007 at 03.07,
03.23, 03.28, 08.34 and 08.52 with a
duration of 03, 3.04, 6.56, 1.01 and
1.15, the first and last 2 of these
calls (the shortest) were made by
Kate.
- 4415********,
- 4417********
- 4411******** for being numbers
with which relatively long
conversations were held in
comparison to the others.
This letter is
part of the report. Translation:
14-08-2007
This letter is part of the report.
Translation:
Subject: Group timeline after
Madeleine's disappearance
Date:14-08-2007
Dear Sirs,
This report contains a summary of
the 'timeline' that shows the
movements of the group after the
disappearance of Madeleine McCann
from apartment G5A in the Mark
Warner resort in Praia da Luz on 3rd
May 2007. It is centred on the
McCann family and the group of
friends who travelled with them on
holiday to Portugal.
This 'timeline' was created based
upon translations of statements made
be elements of the group to the
Portuguese police, from statements
made in English to 'Control Risks'
by five elements of the group and by
Emma Knights, manager of client
support services for Mark Warner,
from various statements and
questioning of Mark Warner staff
made to the Portuguese and British
police and from questioning carried
out at that time.
At about 22.00 when Kate Healy
returned to the apartment to check
on the children, the rest of the
group were at the Tapas
Bar/Restaurant except for Jane
Tanner, who was in her apartment G5D
as, Evie, one of her children was
unwell.
When Kate discovered that her
daughter Madeleine was not in the
apartment (G5A) she ran back to the
Tapas Bar to alert the rest of the
group.
Dianne Webster remained at the table
whilst all the others rushed to the
apartment. Gerry McCann and Kate
Healy were the first to return to
their apartment, where Kate had left
the patio doors completely open and
the twins were fast asleep in their
beds.
Gerald searched the apartment and
stated that the window of the
children's bedroom was open and the
shutter raised. He checked the
shutter before continuing to search
outside.
All the men from the group began to
search the immediate area.
David Payne ran from the McCann's
apartment towards the Millennium
area. Then he turned in the
direction of the church. He searched
the rocky areas of the beach/coast
and checked the stands and boats. He
then returned to the Ocean Club
reception, passing the Millennium
area. David then checked the area
around the walls together with
Matthew Oldfield.
Russell O'Brien was in the McCann's
apartment for a moment only, rushing
out to search the perimeter of the
apartment. Then he went to look for
Madeleine with Matthew Oldfield.
They went in the direction of the
beach. He searched the perimeter of
the tennis courts and the paths
leading to the beach. Russell
searched the gardens and all of the
surrounding area. He searched the
eastern part of the beach,
zigzagging back along the roads to
the McCann's apartment. All the time
more people were joining in the
search and Russell knew the police
had been contacted.
Afterwards he searched the adjacent
apartments to the east of Kate and
Gerry along the Rua da Ramalhete and
more apartments to the east. On some
occasions David Payne was with him.
When Matthew saw that Madeleine was
not in the apartment, he went to the
24 hours reception to ask them to
telephone the police. Matthew spent
most of the night searching the
neighbouring areas for Madeleine
without success. Matthew searched
the road between the apartment and
the Creche. He searched between the
apartment and the Millennium
restaurant, also along the beach and
finally a cemetery as well as the
road leading back to the apartment.
Part of this search was carried out
with David Payne and Russell O'Brien
and part was carried out alone.
Matthew talked to an Indian
insurance salesman and saw Nathan,
the director of the beach
concession.
Fiona Payne was the only woman from
the group to help in the searches.
Fiona searched the periphery of the
complex ' one search, which she made
alone. When she returned she spent
the rest of the night with Kate.
After waiting at the restaurant
table for five minutes, Dianne
Webster went to the McCann's
apartment where she entered the
children's bedroom and saw Kate with
the twins. Kate insisted on the fact
that the window and shutters were
open when she saw the children,
Dianne went outside to see if she
could raise the shutter from the
outside and found it to be
impossible. Dianne stayed in the
McCann's apartment for about 5
minutes and then returned to the
restaurant to fetch her bag, the
McCann's camera and the baby
monitor. She then immediately
returned to the McCann's apartment.
Gerry and Kate were in the apartment
as well as Fiona. Fiona asked Dianne
to stay with Lily and Scarlet to
check that they were ok. Dianne
returned to the Payne apartment and
stayed there for the rest of the
night.
Rachel Mampilly went to see her own
daughter before going to meet Jane
in her apartment. When they talked
Jane told her that when she had gone
to check on the children she saw
Gerry and Jez talking together as
well as a man carrying a child. Jane
told Rachel that she had not said
anything at the time because nobody
knew that Madeleine had gone missing
and she had not seen the child's
face.
Summary
It is difficult to confirm where all
the elements were in the minutes/
hours after the discovery that
Madeleine was missing. It appears
that most of the women remained
within or near the apartments, Fiona
Payne left and searched around the
complex, before returning to the
McCann's apartment where she stayed
with Kate. Then Emma Knights (client
support director) searched the beach
area and asked Kate what Madeleine
had been wearing. Shortly afterwards
Emma returned to the McCann's
apartment and stayed with Kate.
The men's movements, however, are
more difficult to pinpoint.
Gerald was seen and spoken to by
Neil Berry and Raj Malu. They heard
him calling for Madeleine when they
were sitting on Neil's balcony, not
far from the McCann's apartment.
They both went down to talk to
Gerald and helped in the search.
Both David Payne and Matthew
Oldfield were seen by Emma Knights
when she was on her way to the
beach, the search area to which she
was assigned by Lyndsey Johnson
(child care director and search
coordinator).
At about 01.00 Matthew was with John
Hill (resort manager) when they
knocked on Jeremy Wilkins's door to
ask if he had seen anything.
At about 23.30 a white fair haired
man aged about 30, one of the
friends of the McCann group was seen
by
Valerie Kerr
and her family when
he asked them if they had seen
Madeleine. They were near to the
chapel. Valerie and Laura returned
to their apartment, changed clothes
and went to help with the search.
Conclusion
In the confusion following the
disappearance of Madeleine it would
be possible that one of the men or
Fiona Payne 'escaped' to join in the
searches again later.
Analyst 7792 Eaton
|
At about 23.30 a
white fair haired
man aged about 30,
one of the friends
of the McCann group
was seen by
Valerie Kerr
and her family when
he asked them if
they had seen
Madeleine. They were
near to the chapel.
Valerie and Laura
returned to their
apartment, changed
clothes and went to
help with the
search.
No statement from
the Kerr family in
the files missing
pages |
|
01-08 pages 01 to 08 Title
Page Report Analysis |
02-8 Outros Apensos II May 2007 (File 08) Pages 01 to 08 |
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_1 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_2 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_3 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_4 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_5 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_6 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_7 |
|
OApenso_2_rel_may07_Page_8 |
|
timeline - Initiation of Robert
Murat as translator
May 2007 Report from the Central
Brigade for Information Analysis
Development of the Investigation
Outros Apensos II - Analysis Report - May 2007 (File 08)
Analysis Report
1) Introduction
On 28 April 2007, coming from the UK there arrived at the Ocean
Club in Praia da Luz - Lagos four English couples and the mother
of one female member of them. All the couples were accompanied
by children, with a maximum age of 4 years.
The Group comprised:
- Gerald McCann + Kate Healy = Madeleine (4) and Sean and Amelie
(twins) (2).
- Russel O'Brien + Jane Tanner = E**a (3) and E**e (1)
- Matthew Oldfield + Rachael Manpilly = G***e (1)
- David Payne + Fiona Payne + (Diane Webster) = Scarlett (1) and
Lilly (3)
The journey and stay was booked and organised in the UK through
Mark Warner, a company with which they already had prior
contact, namely a trip to Greece in the previous year.
The return from Algarve to UK should have occurred on 5 May
2007.
Generally, days spent in the Ocean Club followed a certain
routine.
The children took breakfast with the parents after which they
went to mini clubs, in the area, where they participated in
recreation activities suited with to their respective ages. They
ate with their parents at lunch time and returned to kid club
for the afternoon. About 18h00 the parents went to collect the
children to return to the apartments. They gave them a bath and
dinner and put them to bed around 19h30/20h00.
During the periods that the children were in the mini clubs, the
parents indulged in various amusement activities, namely tennis,
jogging, reading, etc.
Except for the first day, the Group of adults dined in the Tapas
restaurant (situated next to the Ocean Club swimming pool) where
a table was reserved for nine persons. These dinners started
around 20h30/21h00, going on until about 24h00.
Given that there was no (or two parents had not been informed)
system of monitoring children during the dinner time, the
parents resolved to make their own checks of their children by
going to the apartments approximately each half hour.
This check on the children was performed by their own parents,
or, some times, by parents of other children who, when going to
observe their children would also check on the others. However,
in some cases, this was limited to passing next to the bedroom
windows and listening for crying.
* * *
The McCann apartment is situated on the ground floor, at the
eastern end of the building. It is accessible in two ways: -
through the main door giving access on the same side as bedroom
window of Madeleine and the twins (see photos on page 12); - on
the opposite side through two (sliding) glass doors, one into
the lounge and the other into the couple's bedroom. These give
access to the veranda from which a stairway, through a small
gate, gives access to the side street.
Because this latter access is most convenient, it being closest
to the restaurant entrance, the lounge door stayed closed but
not locked in a way that it could be opened from the outside,
permitting there to be a gap in which to introduce a hand
{i.e. the reporter says
that the door would be ajar}.
2) The Event
On the night of 3 May, at 20h30, the McCanns were the first to
arrive at the 'Tapas'. The others were arriving up to about
21h00.
At 21h00 Matthew went to see his daughter. He said that he
listened next to the bedrooms of the other children and all was
quiet.
At 21h05/21h10 Gerald went to see his children. He entered by
the sliding door. It was strange that the door from the lounge
into the bedroom was a little more open than they had left it
when they went out. But, he thought that Madeleine had got up
and returned to bed. He saw that Madeleine and the twins were in
their respective beds and quiet [peaceful/undisturbed]. He went
to the WC and left by the sliding door. In the street, near to
the gate, he met Jez, whom he knew from tennis, with whom he
spoke for 3 to 5 minutes.
At this time (21h15), coming from the restaurant and going to
see her children, Jane Tanner passed by them. She says that at
that moment she saw walking on the road perpendicular [to the
road on which she was walking], about 10 metres away, a man
carrying a child in his arms (see diagram and photo on pages
50/51). The child was barefoot and [dressed] in pyjamas, but she
thought only that it was strange [for the child] not to be
covered. She did not notice if the external blinds of
Madeleine's bedroom were down or raised.
Neither Gerald nor Jez noted the passage of Jane nor did they
see the man with the child in his arms.
At 21h30 Matthew left the 'Tapas' to go to see his children. He
said to Kate that he would check her children. He entered the 5A
lounge by the sliding door. He thought that the bedroom of
Madeleine and the twins was brighter than usual, it appearing to
him that the external blinds could have been lifted.. However,
he paid no attention to it and limited himself to looking into
the bedroom through the door that was open enough [for him to
see]. He says that he saw the twins were in the cots and that
all was quiet. As Madeleine's bed was against the nearside wall
he did not see if she was in her bed.
At 22h00 Kate went to her apartment. She entered by the sliding
door and, at once, noticed that the bedroom door was fully open,
the window was open, the external blinds raised and the curtains
pulled to the sides. The twins were sleeping in the cots but
Madeleine had disappeared.
Only later, after knowing the colour of the pyjamas, did Jane
come to the conclusion that the child she says she had seen in
the arms of the man could have been Madeleine.
2.1 Time Line, of the Group -
(Annexe 2)
A time line was prepared, based on the statements of the Group
members, trying to determine the time at which Madeleine
disappeared.
2.1.1) - Conclusion
From what was stated, and if the child carried in the arms of
the man referred to by Jane Tanner was Madeleine, then the
abductor (given the very limited time between Gerald leaving and
the moment Jane says she saw him) was already inside the
apartment when Gerald went there at 21h05/21h10, having exited
immediately afterwards.
If it was not Madeleine, and Jane, later, unintentionally, had
created that conviction, the disappearance could have occurred
after [later]. Either between Gerald's exit and Matthew's
entrance (21h30), or between his exit and Kate's arrival
(22h00).
From any manner [Anyway], everything leads one to believe that
the author [of the time line] exercised control over the Group
of 9.
3 Development of the
Investigation
(Not leaving
out of the assessment two possibilities, however remote: - one,
Madeleine walking out by herself, to have lost herself [to have
got lost], and to be in an unknown place - the other, an
attempted robbery (the individual, being interrupted by Gerald's
entrance, and allowing that Madeleine had seen him, or something
had gone wrong, having resolved [decided] to take her with him.)
Now, according to all the work performed and all the clues
collected, everything points to Madeleine having been abducted.
There having been no ransom demand, we believe the following
motivations remain:
- of a sexual nature - 'predator' and/or a paedophile network;
- human trafficking;
- childless person/couple or substitution for a missing child;
- revenge against Madeleine's parents, for professional or
impassioned reasons, etc.
During the investigation certain clues were determined that,
collectively, pointed to a suspect - Robert Murat. Because they
were closed associated with him, the investigation focused,
also, its attention on his friend/girlfriend - Michaela Walczuch
and on a Russian individual, a computer expert - Sergey Malinka,
with whom they were associated.
3.1) Time Line, the suspects -
(Annexe 3)
A time line was prepared, based on the statements of the arguido
and close witnesses referred to above, for the geographic
locations and timings.
3.1.1) Time line - Beginning of
Robert Murat's participation as translator - (Annexe 4)
Based on contradictory statements, a time line was prepared from
the moment Robert Murat began his activity as 'translator'.
It is noted that only three members of the Group of 9, and only
after him having been considered suspect, came forward to affirm
that he was seen in the area of the apartment on the night of 3
- 4 May, a short time after the disappearance of Madeleine. The
rest of the witnesses questioned about his participation [being
in the area], namely members of the GNR, affirmed not having
seen him, or that they saw him only on May 4.
But, generally, they classified his demeanour as being, not like
someone who was interested solely in translations, but as having
an attitude that exceeded that role, wanting to acquaint himself
with the things discovered and 'to drive' [steer; direct] some
investigation activities.
4) OBJECTIVE
Supported by the lists of phone calls, to compare the
declarations made and to try the clarify the kind of
relationship between the participants and/or others.
4.1) Chronogram (timing diagram)
of communications (Annexes 5, 6 and 7)
Flow charts of phone calls (Annexes 8, 9 , 10 and 11)
The following list of mobile and fixed telephones were
determined:
Robert Murat: mobile 919****41; fixed 282****16
Michaela Walczuch mobile 919****59 and 960****59; fixed
282****89
Sergey Malinka mobile 914****57; fixed 282****07
Lists of calls made and received were requested from the
operators [phone service companies], along with SMS [records]
showing the destination and originating phones, and the records
from the cell masts activated.
Supported by these lists, along with our authority to read the
mobile phone call lists, and the authority to read calendars,
the respective communication timing diagrams were prepared.
In the timing diagrams (Annexes 5, 6 and 7) calls on days 2, 3
and 4 May were reviewed and analysed.
All phones were identified where possible, whether Portuguese,
English or other nationality. Telephone lists from PT, TMN,
VODAPHONE and OPTIMUS [the four service operators] were used.
Collaboration from officers of the UK police was relied on to
identify telephones of that country. Similarly, they correlated
all the phone numbers in the inquiry and the calendars under
review.
It was sought to compare and to correlate, whether through the
flow charts of calls, or through the cell masts activated by the
mobile phones, by place/time, the declarations made by each one
of those seen.
No discrepancies were found between the time line (statements of
RM, MW and SM) and the timing diagram, either in terms of the
time that calls were made or received, or in terms of masts
activated. But there were omissions, due to forgetfulness or
intent.
In this way, one realises, only for him, it is not proven, for
determined periods of time, where Robert Murat was located,
specifically in the period in which Madeleine disappeared.
[At this point the report lists
various calls made and received on RM's mobile and his (and his
mother's) fixed service number on 2 and 3 May.
The report continues:]
Observation:
There should be new inquiries made of Robert and Michaela in
order to clarify the calls between them on 3 May from 20h15 to
20h25 (fixed), from 23h20 to 23h29 (mobile), from 23h55 to 23h37
(mobile), 23h40 to 23h47 (mobile) and from 23h53 to 24h01
(fixed).
And the call of 30 seconds from Robert to Sergey at 23h39 ' the
only such call on those days.
In the flow charts (Annexes 8, 9, and 10) there were considered
and analysed connections on days 1, 2, 3 and 4 May 2007,
relating to each telephone.
In the flow chart (Annexe 11 - combination of call in Annexes 8,
9 and 10) there were considered and analysed connections on the
days 1, 2, 3 and 4 May 2007, together with the target numbers.
- In the period under review, calls by phone and SMS between RM
and MW are demonstrated, ether by mobile or fixed service
phones.
- No calls are recorded between MW and SM. Between RM and SM
only one call is recorded.
- No common numbers are shared between SM and RM, nor between SM
and MW.
- Only one common number was found between RM and MW
707960000 UZO (Call Centre)
5) Conclusion
The flow of calls analysed, from fixed and mobile phones, and
the respective comparison with witness statements, found no
evidence of significant discrepancy.
A close, ongoing relationship between RM and MW was noted
There exists a relationship between RM and SM, but in the period
looked at there was only a single call.
There were no telephone contacts common to the three people.
For the reasons presented, it is not possible, in this way, to
better clarify the, possible, participation of any of them in
the events under investigation.
Lisboa, 28 May 2007 |
TO HELP KEEP THIS SITE ON
LINE PLEASE CONSIDER
|
|
|
|
|